Process |
Traditional
Methods |
Low-Waste Technologies |
Building Design |
|
Use of materials size does not correspond with the dimensions in
the building |
|
With the standard modular approach, walls and slabs are standardized
in both size an shape, being interchangeable between different
building types |
|
|
Building
components not standardized |
|
Standardized
building components |
|
|
Down-stand
beams and columns detrimental to large panel formwork system
construction |
|
Walls
and flat slabs only, no down-stand beams and columns |
|
|
Specifications
exceed the performance required |
|
Modification
of specifications to suit the contractor’s available equipment and
materials |
|
|
Significant
unnecessary mid-project variations |
|
Less
design variation |
Formwork |
|
Conventional timber formwork |
|
Large steel panel forms |
|
|
Double
the cost of using steel panel in long run |
|
High
initial cost but balanced by the long terms savings in timber
formwork |
|
|
Labour
intensive for erecting and striking formwork |
|
Less
labour force required for erecting and striking formwork |
|
|
Longer
construction duration |
|
High
efficiency, twice faster than timber formwork system |
|
|
Plastering
need for leveling concrete surface |
|
Better
quality concrete products, concrete surfaces suitable for applying
tiles and paints directly |
|
|
Reused
8-15 times, several sets of timber forms needed for a high-rise
block |
|
Reused
over 100 times, one set of forms sufficient to complete a block and
can be reused in another sites |
|
|
Hand
lift timber board from floor to floor |
|
Tower
cranes needed for lifting formwork |
|
|
Considerable
timber waste produced |
|
Waste
steel scrapped for recycling, less waste produced |
Concrete Work |
|
In-situ placement |
|
Precast concrete |
|
|
Time
consuming |
|
Shorter
construction time |
|
|
Higher
labour cost |
|
Higher
initial cost but relative cheaper for large quantity |
|
|
Poor
quality, honeycombing often occurs |
|
Mass
production, high degree of quality control |
|
|
Plastering
required before applying tiles and paints |
|
Elements
usually completed with necessary fixtures and finishes, no need for
further finishing works |
|
|
More
waste produced |
|
About
30% less waste than in-situ concreting |
Masonry Work |
|
Brick walls or concrete block walls |
|
Internal drywall partitions |
|
|
Lower
materials cost but higher labour cost |
|
Higher
materials cost but lower labour cost |
|
|
High
skill levels |
|
Easy
to install, low skill levels |
|
|
Thick
layer of plaster needed |
|
Smooth
surface and no plastering needed |
|
|
Time
consuming |
|
Four
times faster than masonry work plus plastering |
|
|
More
waste produced |
|
Wet
trade not involved, hence less waste generated |
|
|
Walls
with higher strength |
|
Walls
with lower strength |
Plastering |
|
Conventional mortar cement |
|
Spray Plaster |
|
|
Manual
Applying |
|
Mechanical
spraying |
|
|
Suitable
for rough wall surface, further leveling is required |
|
Suitable
for smooth wall surface, further leveling is not required |
|
|
Time
consuming |
|
Faster
construction |
|
|
Labour
intensive |
|
Less
labour demand |
|
|
More
waste generated |
|
Less
waste generated |
Hoarding |
|
Timber hoarding |
|
Steel hoarding |
|
|
Cheaper
materials cost, easy to erect |
|
Expensive
and demand higher labour force for erection, but safe for passer-by |
|
|
Less
durable, about 2 years lifetime |
|
More
durable, about 4.5 years lifetime |
|
|
Low
reusability, discarded after used once |
|
High
reusability, waste steel scrapped for recycling |
|
|
More
timber waste produced |
|
70%
less waste |
Scaffolding |
|
Conventional bamboo scaffold |
|
Gondola with Passenger Lift |
|
|
Lower
initial cost |
|
Higher
initial cost, but balanced by saving in materials cost in the long
run |
|
|
High
labour cost |
|
Less
labour force required |
|
|
Less
safe for workers |
|
More
safe for workers |
|
|
More
bamboo waste produced |
|
80%
less waste |